Our language discriminates against women and perpetuates gender stereotypes.

It values men by a physical attribution they cannot control, their phallus' size and erection.

The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.

What is conceivable and what is not, what makes sense and what does not, depends on the rules of language, of grammar.

The complex, intertwined relationship between a language and the form of life that goes with it means that problems arising from language cannot just be set aside–they infect our lives, steering confusion, frustration and violence.

The same as, technology cannot progress without new terms, Internet, gigabyte, multiprocessor--the same as medicine cannot cure malaria if this notion didn't exist before--the same as you cannot travel to a place you never heard of--the same as it is impossible to ask for something without it exists--the same goes for gender.

The demand to speak equality, is simply a demand of consistency and coherence. Since language changes to keep up with reality and to allow it to progress, this should be applied to any field of human activity. Currently it applies to all fields, but gender.

Assuming you are somehow and average individual, you are probably feel infuriated or lost by now. All this discussion about women and men and feminism doesn't make any sense... and if so, it simply shows how frustrated you are with our language.

All this discussion about men, feminsime and equality is so awkward not becuase we are touchy and opinionated beings. The problem is that gender related words that we use in this discussion are so confusing and inaccurate, that is we don't have the proper words and syntax to clarify what is the subject of our discussion.

Gender biased language isn’t the claim that all men abuse women nor that all women are discriminated.

Gender biased language could be somehow be visualised by the following paradox - while reasonable people agree that women are discriminated and exposed to abused much more than men are - we don't have a proper word to refer to it. As soon as one mentions all men, women are usually, the feminists... the discussion is charged with so many subtexts .

In other words, we cannot talk about a fundamental social problem - an issue that concerns us all. Problems aren't kind enough to evaporate themselves so we can avoid dealing with them. Actually, closing our eyes only makes it bigger and more complex.

For a solution to be found, the problem needs first to be properly defined. It would be challenging, but the price to avoid it, seems to be constant confusion, mistrust among people, insecurity, a constant fear to express oneself - to name only few aspects that effects anyone, he, she or it. Is it really needed to inject more agitation and confusion to the current state of things?

Language could help us solve these confusions and allow us to turn down background noises that are totally avoidable.

Before we evoke consideration of preserving our language and thus our language, we need to ensure that our language allow us to properly communicate ourselves. Currently, we don't. Also, it might also be worth defending a tradition that is worth being defended.

Progress won't await for our language to accommodate it. Languages that cannot express it, would simply disappear.

Gender biased language isn’t only damaging it is also senseless. Placing gender at the center of our communication and claim it's essential is bizarre to say the least. Semantically, and linguistically wise, it creates contradiction and inherent semantic deficiencies… kind of problems that language should resolve rather than create.